Slavery and its Social Impact, “Social Death”

asmaw's picture
Tagged:  •    •    •    •    •    •    •    •  

Note: Posted this because I read scraps of former sanity's blog, This, though, has almost nothing to do with Abraham Lincoln, but everything to do with slavery. Also, this was for class, it might be a bit obvious but there is a paper that I am referencing and critiquing. You need not have read the paper.

Slavery’s repercussions are long lasting and at times, seem to be unconquerable; In American society, we can still feel the impact that this extreme form of domination has left for the many generations that are descendants of ex-slaves. Orlando Patterson, in his paper titled “Slavery and Social Death,” takes the route of analyzing and uncovering what exactly slavery did to the one that was enslaved. He dissects how the relationship between master and slave developed, persisted and that it meant the death, socially, for someone to be enslaved. Patterson explains how the constitution of human relationships is that of the powers of those who are interacting by using definitions and explanations on power given by Weber and Marx. One thing clear about slavery is that it encompassed the domination of a person’s physical and social being by another; it meant that slavery was human interaction of inequality in power at its most extreme.

Patterson explains how there are three facets of power, social, psychological and cultural, that coincide with three distinct features that form slavery. Slavery, he contends, is not only distinct because of the extremity of power and what it implies, but also through “the qualities of coercion that brought the relation into being and sustained it.” In the foremost, slavery was domination through the use of violence, because this violence was crucial in “creating and maintaining the domination,” of the slave by the master. Slavery is a special case of using might or violence in a society of stratified classes; it meant that the initial act of violence had to be repeated by the master to ensure that slave numbers did not lessen through death or freedom. Not only was violence, through the use of the whip, necessary to ensure “original accumulation” of slaves but it was also required to motivate the slaves to work, “by the need to reinforce reward with the threat and actuality of punishment.” The Marxists understood the need for this use of force to keep the master and slave relationship in check but so did a North Carolina judge, Thomas Ruffian who clarified that intentional wounding of a slave by his hirer was all right.

The powerlessness that was a feature of a slave originated in the fact that slavery was a replacement for death. This is explained by the fact that the slave was alive as long he “acquiesced in his powerlessness.” A slave in essence had no social worth or value, he was a social non-person without his master; this was the second feature of enslavement. It meant the natal alienation of the person from society took away any and all rights. The slave was a person of isolation and socially nonexistent because he had no formally recognized claim to anything or anyone in the society. He had no relations, no formal bonds to anyone; he was not a father, wife or child. Informal relationships existed but marriages between slaves, mother-child, or sibling relationships had no formal or social value placed on them in a slave society. The natal alienation because a slave had no ties to anything through birth or any claim to anyone, led to the third aspect of slavery. This aspect was one where the person who was a slave had lost his honor, the dishonored nature of a slave spoke volumes. An enslaved being had nothing to defend so where was his honor? He had none because honor means one has power and in slavery, the slave has no power, it is the power of the master he relied on.

Slavery, one can look back in time and see, was one of the most despicable human relationships or forms of interaction that allowed for one man to dominate over another and essentially take over the person’s entire being. Patterson uses powerful examples to demonstrate how this relationship was created and sustained. Slavery meant the effective use of violence by the master to destroy any and all social ties of the slave, and create a being that had no worth or place in society except to the one who was his master. Slavery was meant to achieve the complete domination of a person, by killing and destroying the person’s honor, pride to create the only place in society for that person through having a master. It is sickening to look back at what people did to another human and what happened in the lives of so many because of slavery.

asmaw's picture

I could make an effort to post it, I think I have it somewhere in my saved files, I really loved it and it might be because I am biased but I think you all will too.

"No, not rich. I am a poor man with money, which is not the same thing."
- Gabriel Garcia Marquez, Love in the Time of Cholera Fudge "It's the hard-knock life..."

_Meke's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

That was very good.

I hope the departure is joyful and I hope never to return~Frida Kahlo

asmaw's picture

@.@

"No, not rich. I am a poor man with money, which is not the same thing." - Gabriel Garcia Marquez, Love in the Time of Cholera Fudge "It's the hard-knock life..."

turtlesuds's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

"Consistency is not a human trait" - Maude, from Harold and Maude

asmaw's picture

:idk: what is wrong with you two -__-

"No, not rich. I am a poor man with money, which is not the same thing." - Gabriel Garcia Marquez, Love in the Time of Cholera Fudge "It's the hard-knock life..."

cosmic's picture

Is Patterson addressing all slavery throughout history, or only American slavery? American slavery seems especially harsh and brutal when compared to other, much older slave societies. For example, slaves in ancient Rome, while still considered their master's property, where often involved with their masters' families, lives, and businesses. Cicero's most trusted advisor and speech writer was his slave. The Emperor's secretary was traditionally a slave. And many skilled craftsmen where also slaves. These slaves were often freed, and their children were considered full citizens of the Roman Empire.

However, the cases described above were probably rare. Most slaves were dedicated to hard labor, and had no or little chance of freedom. All the same, this exception that occurred in Ancient Rome- albeit rare- never occurred in America. I wonder why? Racism probably played its role, and I'm surprised Patterson didn't address it.

And yes, it was a good paper.

asmaw's picture

on American and then uses, historical slavery to compare it to American slavery.

This was for my sociology Minorities in the United States course, which I never took the final for, but did all the course work class.

I was stupid and depressed and didn't think finals were important.

“You cannot wean away an addict from the drug. It is not possible for me to walk away from Ranjha. If it is our destiny to be together then who, other than God, can change it?”
she's a spaceman, no walker, dreamer...maybe

we ever really did away with slavery, the masters just rule and abuse us surreptitiously.
How many people know that USURY and giving false measure is forbidden in the true Torah, Bible and the Quran (and other books).
I liked the article, I would just like to point out that slavery is still alive and well all around the world.
When a government goes bankrupt, it loses its sovereignty. In 1933 the U.S. declared bankruptcy, as expressed in Roosevelt's Executive Order 6073, 6102, 6111, and 6260, House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933, confirmed in Perry v. U.S., (1935) 294 U.S. 330, 381; 79 L.ED. 912, also 31 USC 5112, 5119 and 12 USC 95a. The bankrupt U.S. went into receivership reorganized in favor of 115 creditors and new owners. In 1913, congress turned over America lock, stock and barrel to a handful of criminals whose avowed intent from the beginning was to plunder, bankrupt, conquer and ‘enslave’ the people of the United States of America and eliminate the nation from the face of the earth. The goal was, and is, to absorb America into a one-world privately owned commercial government. A "NEW WORLD ORDER." With the Erie R.R. v. Thompkins case of 1938 the Supreme Court confirmed their success. We are now in an international private commercial jurisdiction in colorable admiralty-maritime under the Law Merchant. We have been conned and betrayed out of our sovereignty, rights, property, freedom, common law, Article III courts, and our REPUBLIC. The Bill of Rights has been statutized into "civil rights" in commerce. America has been stolen. We have been made slaves, i.e., permanent debtors, bankrupt, in legal incapacity, rendered commercial "person", residents and corporate franchisees know as "citizens of the United States" under the so-called "14th Amendment," which was never ratified - see Congressional Record, June 12, 1967; Dvett v. Turner (1968) 439 P.2d 266; State v. Phillips, (1975)(affirmed) and created a citizenship for corporations (abstract) statutory entities, which are the products and definitions of the legislature and are fully taxable and regulatable thereby. (You may also want to study the Organic Act of 1871)
BTW, I don't think any other bills should be passed in either the house or senate unless we get a complete and independent audit of the fed. Doesn't anyone see how they are the basis of this whole mess? Imagine what someone or a group of 'people' could do with complete control of a country's monetary supply FOR 100 YEARS WITH NO OVERSIGHT! The fed is a private corporation and has been usurping the US constitution for a century. Yet they win again when they succeed in dividing the populace on other issues whether valid or not. Here there is an active bill to finally audit the fed after 100 years and who is paying attention? Don’t let this get by or the world will surely pay.
HR1207 / S604 WWW.AUDITTHEFED.COM
The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them.
Patrick Henry

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.