In my last blog, I explained why Ozone shouldn't just randomly decompose at high rates. Sure, natural pollutants are a problem, but there is a better explanation: People. The largest problem, as I see it, would have been Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). The massive word in the title is the chemical name for CClF3. This is essentially Freon. In this blog I will explain how CFCs came about and what they do to Ozone. Global Warming doesn't exist.
A Brief History of Chlorofluorocarbons
In the year 2000, J.R.McNeill wrote that Thomas Midgley Jr "had more impact on the atmosphere than any other single organism in earth history." LINK
Among various other problematic solutions offered by Midgley was the use of CFCs to replace dangerous, and often explosive, chemicals used in heat pumps, refrigerators, etc. Midgley also suggested leaded fuel to prevent engine knock (this later caused him to acquire lead poisoning, go figure).
Midgley was rather excited about his discovery, going so far as to demonstrate it by inhaling large amounts of concentrated Freon while holding a lit match to prove that not only was it non-toxic, it wasn't explosive. Imagine being able to go home and know that your refrigerator wasn't going to explode and kill you that night! What made Chlorofluorocarbons so exciting is that they're completely inert at 1.00 atm and 25o C. Not only was Freon not going to react, it wasn't going to burn or suffocate you!
However, what wasn't tested before its widespread use (in everything from refrigerators and heat pumps to aerosol cans and deodorant) were the chemical properties as it rose into the atmosphere with decreased pressure and increased UV radiation (γ = Gamma Radiation, or UV radiation for our purposes).
The Problem
The problem with Freon lies in its uncanny ability to split when hit with lots of UV radiation. As the UV radiation hits Freon, it kicks off the Cl atom. This Cl atom is very dangerous (and unhappy...poor halogen!) to the ozone. As it floats around, it will bond with a molecule of O3 (Ozone, if you were paying attention). This breaks apart into diatomic oxygen (O2) and ClO (Hypochlorite). The Hypochlorite then attracts another molecule of Ozone, they react and form Cl and 2O2. The Cl molecule then continues the cycle, increasing in concentration as the CFCs in the atmosphere break apart.
As you can tell, this isn't exactly what we want to happen. The CFCs cause damage that not even the spontaneous generation of Ozone can fix (as a lot of this generation fixes damage caused by spontaneous decomposition, natural pollutants, etc.).
Luckily enough, the Montreal Protocol has put a complete ban on CFC use and CFC production will cease to be a problem in the year 2010.
Due to concerns about its ozone-depleting potential, the consumption of chlorotrifluoromethane is continuously decreasing; the production would be stopped in 2010. LINK
Now, keep in mind that this is a VERY simplified and generalized (I used Freon-13 because I like the formula and name; there are others) concept. People spend entire lifetimes dedicated to the specifics here; I broke it down so that anyone could understand and regurgitate it.
And I'm merely suggesting that this was a bad move on mankind’s part, not that Global Warming exists. So long as Douche Bag claims it does, I promise to stand by my aforementioned convictions.



I still got a little lost, but that just might be because my poor sleep deprived brain couldn't process it right now.
But I am glad that you can prove global warming doesn't exist. I've never thought it existed and this has me convinced even more.
Global Warming doesn't exist because Al Gore believes in it. When Al Gore is dead I will believe in Global Warming. Until then, I am just offering what I'm learning as proof that the Ozone layer (responsible for protecting the Earth for radiation from the sun that is basically harmful to the animals on Earth) is not doing so hot. I've got to think about what reaction I decide to do next.
In short, the comments in the blog regarding Global Warming are sarcasm; it does exist and it is a problem. Do I think it's as bad as I'm told? No. It's probably way worse.
What part lost you, by the way? I'll try to simplify/clear it up.
Nick
RAmen
Oh, I gathered your blog was sarcastic. The second half of my comment was partially sarcastic. I'm on the fence right now about whether or not global warming exists.
I got lost around the splitting part. That's probably because it has been awhile since I've had chemistry. But when I re-read it this morning, it made a bit more sense.
Does Al Gore know you have it in for him?
Good blog, btw. It was the first time I've ever understood anything chemistry related.
http://www.progressiveu.org/blog/ediblewoman
He's not proving global warming doesn't exist. It's pretty hard to prove that, with all the evidence against it. It's a lot easier to prove that it's not man's fault global warming (which, I believe, is more accurately termed 'global climate change').
What he IS proving is that man was involved in the growing of the hole in the ozone over Antarctica. It's a shame he didn't include the pretty pictures that go with it, but let's see if I can dig them up...
This one is from October 27, 1980.
This one is from September 29, 2005.
The dark colors mean less ozone :-)
~C
Check out the latest entry in the Between The Lines column!
Want the highest rated list to change? RATE those blogs, then!
Thanks for the pretty pictures! I realized what he was proving this morning when I re-read it. I really do not know where my brain was last night!